20191011 Tachikawa Nishio chat notes
Organized based on this conversation: [Thought Node 2019-10-14 - Scrapbox by NISHIO Hirokazu https://scrapbox.io/nishio/%E6%80%9D%E8%80%83%E3%81%AE%E7%B5%90%E7%AF%80%E7%82%B 92019-10-14]
I want to make knowledge look good.
How do you define "nice"?
Not looking good right now.
nishio.icon You're stuck on the "P" in PRO Model.
Book format old-fashioned
Can I read a book?
Shouldn't a better way be created in this day and age?
Table of Contents
Civil Code Map
The assumption that a human being is going to read it is wrong in the first place.
What kind of things does AI read?
search (e.g. for someone using a search engine)
Keywords → Text
inverted index
This should evolve.
Man must create keywords.
Poorly derived results from keywords
When humans interact, they are not searching by keywords.
Groupware, Experience, Books, Yahoo Chieftaincy
Return proposed action with situation as input?
Example
Want to improve poor customer attraction
Ask your instructor to help you attract customers."
I don't want to ask the instructor to attract customers.
→Action proposal: Instead of making a request (instruction for action), why not share information on the current situation?
Issues need to be verbalized.
This activity is too advanced and is far beyond the system we are trying to create now.
Generation? Abstraction?
It is impossible for a human being to read all the groupware, experiences, books, Yahoo Wisdom
We need a presence that reads everything instead.
Brain emulator: The human raw brain is inferior and needs to be replaced.
What's the point of reading a book and highlighting it?
Discovering a sharp expression of what was already in me
Read books and learn new things
Read understand the meaning of the time difference.
「 People have individual differences. 」
I used to, but then one day I got hooked and started to get passionate about it.
「 human bug 」
It was already noted in Scrapbox.
After a time, I realized how "important and interesting" it was.
Quotes are context dependent
Why is Drucker. interesting?
Bring about a change in mental models
Drucker does not explain by quotation
My observations and reflections
It was written in the textbooks." Lame.
The association defines "~" as "~." That's lame.
false objectivity
⇔ Properly subjective Not done.
a decent subjectivity that springs from the belly
You have to create your own words to make it interesting.
I want to emulate subjectivity.
Collecting subjectivity
Interesting subjectivity.
Need psychological safety?
I won't be offended if you express what you think (i.e., subjective).
People need subjectivity to be interested.
⇔ objective
Search = "~ contains keyword X"
Analysis = "Keyword X appears N times in ~"
Even if objective specs are good, "boring" will get you NG.
Majority people love subjectivity.
It would be interesting if the listening chat system became subjective.
What are the specifics?
preferences
Propagation from parents to some extent
Is subjectivity created by likes and dislikes?
No single system, but a system of individual differences
A bot that looks at all your Twitter posts and DMs you things you might like
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/20191011立川西尾雑談メモ using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.